Inscriptions: An Unexpected Journey of Growth and Decline

Inscriptions, once hailed as a novel approach to create digital artifacts on the blockchain, have had a meteoric rise and a subsequent sharp decline in recent times, reshaping the landscape of digital tokens and issuance. In this article, we will be exploring the journey of inscriptions from their inception to their peak and to their current state, offering insights into their significance, impact, and what lies ahead for their future.

 

Understanding Inscriptions

In simple terms, inscriptions are tiny digital capsules embedded within Bitcoin's smallest unit, allowing for the creation of verifiable digital assets within the blockchain. They emerged as a technique for embedding data into individual Satoshis, thereby crafting unique digital artifacts reminiscent of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) but within the Bitcoin network. Unlike traditional NFTs, inscriptions store all data directly on-chain, providing durability, immutability, and an exciting new platform for artists to showcase their work.

 

The Surge of Inscriptions

The journey of inscriptions witnessed a surge that reverberated across various EVM-compatible chains. First emerging on the Bitcoin network as the Ordinals protocol built using the BRC-20 token standard, inscriptions found their way into the Ethereum ecosystem, leading to a flurry of activity and adoption. Data from Dune Analytics showcased a notable surge in inscription volumes across different networks in December, particularly on the BNB chain, Polygon, and Avalanche.

For instance, on December 6th, the BNB chain recorded an unprecedented 28 million transactions, while Polygon saw nearly 8 million transactions. During this period, inscriptions constituted a significant portion of network transactions, with some networks experiencing daily counts of over 1 million inscriptions. The charts revealed that at the peak, inscription transactions made up over 50% of the total transactions on certain networks

 

The Decline of Inscriptions

However, this meteoric rise was soon accompanied by a sharp decline in inscription activity. Daily recorded inscriptions on the Ordinals protocol sat at 123,000, down from its peak of 439,500 on December 24th. Recent data on inscriptions on EVM-compatible chains also registered a similar downward trajectory. As of the latest reports, the highest observed inscription count was around 370,000 on the Avalanche network. Moreover, the contribution of inscriptions to network gas fees decreased substantially from the peak levels observed in December.

The decline in inscription activity is evident across various networks, with inscriptions representing a smaller fraction of total transactions. For instance, while they accounted for a significant share of transactions on Avalanche and Ethereum’s Goerli testnet, they significantly decreased on other Layer 2 networks like the Polygon PoS sidechain and BNB Chain.

During the inscription craze's peak in December, certain networks were paying exorbitant gas fees, surpassing the $1 million mark. Avalanche and Arbitrum notably recorded staggering gas expenses, with Avalanche reaching over $5 million and Arbitrum exceeding $2 million on December 16.

However, as the month progressed, several networks started observing a reduction in gas fees, with some dropping below the $1 million threshold. Interestingly, Avalanche remained an outlier, consistently maintaining higher gas fees until December 21st, which then plummeted to around $1,700 at the time of this writing.

 

Controversies and Speculations

The decline in inscription activity has sparked discussions and raised questions about their future trajectory. Controversies have emerged regarding the comparison between inscriptions and traditional NFTs. While NFTs often reference off-chain data stored on IPFS for metadata, inscriptions store all data directly on-chain, offering completeness and durability. However, the lack of creator royalties and limitations in their utility have led to debates about the true value and potential future of inscriptions. Alongside these speculations, there are also several structural problems that have resulted in the decline of inscriptions in recent weeks.

Liquidity Contraction

Characterized by the imminent news of a Bitcoin spot ETF, the current market is witnessing a tightening of liquidity across the broader market. Investors are treading cautiously, seeking safer havens amidst the uncertainties, resulting in a widespread pullback across various sectors, including inscriptions.

Varied Quality of Asset Issuance

The Inscriptions market experienced a rapid proliferation of asset issuance following its initial surge. While this growth initially garnered broad market acceptance, the present landscape exhibits a mix of projects, each differing in quality and reliability. During times of diminished liquidity, projects lacking strong fundamentals and sustained buying interest are susceptible to prolonged declines.

Limited Real-World Application

At present, many Inscriptions projects lack tangible real-world utility and are primarily fueled by speculative fervor aimed at driving token valuations and market visibility. However, the absence of substantial practical use cases renders these tokens vulnerable to price volatility. When the market focus shifts away, these tokens often lack the intrinsic support necessary to withstand sustained selling pressures.

Moreover, there has been a prevalent viewpoint among industry observers highlighting the limitations of inscription tokens in terms of EVM-compatibility and their inability to integrate with third-party protocols. This lack of compatibility and composability within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem restricts the potential utility of inscription tokens. Critics argue that these tokens, primarily perceived as speculative assets, are confined to a narrow scope of application, primarily revolving around speculative trading. The absence of interoperability and reliance on off-chain indexing hampers their broader utilization and functionality within the DeFi landscape, limiting their capacity to contribute meaningfully beyond mere speculation.

 

The Future of Inscriptions

While the recent slowdown in inscription activity might seem like a setback, it could signal a transitional phase rather than a definitive downfall. This apparent decline could be a temporary pause in the evolutionary cycle of the ecosystem. It might pave the way for enhancements, integrations, and innovative applications, reflecting the adaptable nature of blockchain technology. Instead of viewing the current landscape as a decline, it is instead important to perceive it as a phase of adjustment and maturation in the ever-evolving blockchain sphere.

Initially, inscriptions emerged as a trailblazing asset issuance protocol last year, attracting significant attention and investment due to its potential for generating wealth. Key factors, including robust support from exchanges, active developer involvement in Inscriptions protocols, substantial funding for Inscriptions projects, and the backing of Unisat for the Atomicals protocol, underscore the flourishing infrastructure within the Inscriptions landscape. Taking these essential elements into account, the inscriptions sector continues to exhibit promising prospects for future development.

Alvin Kan, Chief Operations Officer of Bitget Wallet, also had this to share:

"It is also important to recognize that the trajectory of nascent sectors often follows a cyclical pattern. There have been significant fluctuations in the growth trajectory of the BRC-20 protocol since March last year before it hit more stable peaks in November. Additionally, once-unfamiliar users also have to go through a discernible learning curve to grasp this novel asset type, gaining insights into the potentials and limitations of Inscriptions projects."

Indeed, this learning journey amongst users reflects a natural phase of adjustment following the introduction of new projects and concepts. Despite the current market sentiment for inscriptions, therefore, they nevertheless remain as a concept worthy of our attention and exploration, forming an indispensable aspect of the broader Web3 and DeFi ecosystem.

 

Closing

While controversies and limitations persist, inscriptions continue to represent a unique form of digital artifacts, offering a glimpse into the future possibilities of blockchain technology and digital ownership.

The journey of inscriptions exemplifies the ever-changing nature of blockchain innovation, where what appears to be a decline could be the precursor to new and unforeseen opportunities in the future. As the blockchain space continues to mature, the potential for new developments and adaptations remains, and inscriptions may yet find new relevance in the broader landscape of digital assets.

The story of inscriptions is still unfolding, holding the promise of future innovations and possibilities that may yet redefine digital ownership and artistic expression in the world of Web3.

 

Follow Bitget Wallet to stay up-to-date with all of our latest events, findings, and promotions, and let Bitget Wallet be your premier gateway into the Web3 space.

For more information, visit: Website | Twitter | Telegram | LinkedIn | Discord

For media inquiries, please contact: [email protected]

For business inquiries, please contact: [email protected]